Individual modulation of the tube current-seconds to achieve similar levels of image noise in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT

被引:17
作者
Irie, T [1 ]
Inoue, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Hitachi Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hitachi, Ibaraki 3170077, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.184.5.01841514
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to determine the optimal region to measure CT image noise and to evaluate the usefulness of the individual modulation of the tube current-second (milliampere-seconds, or mAs) based on body size to obtain images with similar noise levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT images obtained by a 4-MDCT scanner were retrospectively analyzed. The image-acquisition factors were fixed (group A, n = 104). The image noise was measured at five regions: the aorta, the back muscle, the spleen, and the peripheral and the central hepatic portions. Body size was evaluated by two methods on the basis of body weight (method A) and on the scout image data (method B). Coefficients of determination of 10 relationships between body size and image noise were calculated. For the next study, CT images were prospectively obtained by modulating the mAs on the basis of body weight (group B, n = 100) and the scout image data (group C, n = 100). We compared the differences in SDs of aortic image noise in each group using the F test. RESULTS. The coefficients of determination of the aorta were 0.619 and 0.812 for methods A and B, respectively, and the highest values in both methods (p = 1/5(2), Fisher's exact test). The SDs of the aortic image noise of groups A, B, and C were 2.03, 1.6 1, and 1.06, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between each group (p < 0.022), and the SD was the smallest in group C. CONCLUSION. The aorta was the optimal region to measure the image noise. Individual mAs modulation based on the scout image data was useful to obtain images of similar noise levels.
引用
收藏
页码:1514 / 1518
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
BERLAND LL, 1995, RADIOLOGY, V195, P1
[2]   Dose reduction in pediatric CT: A rational approach [J].
Boone, JM ;
Geraghty, EM ;
Seibert, JA ;
Wootton-Gorges, SL .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (02) :352-360
[3]   Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD ;
Hall, EJ ;
Berdon, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :289-296
[4]   Pulmonary nodules: Experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT [J].
Diederich, S ;
Lenzen, H ;
Windmann, R ;
Puskas, Z ;
Yelbuz, TM ;
Henneken, S ;
Klaiber, T ;
Eameri, M ;
Roos, N ;
Peters, PE .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) :289-298
[5]   Computer-simulated radiation dose reduction for abdominal multidetector CT of pediatric patients [J].
Frush, DP ;
Slack, CC ;
Hollingsworth, CL ;
Bisset, GS ;
Donnelly, LF ;
Hsieh, J ;
Lavin-Wensell, T ;
Mayo, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (05) :1107-1113
[6]   Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. 1. Simulation studies [J].
Gies, M ;
Kalender, WA ;
Wolf, H ;
Suess, C ;
Madsen, MT .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (11) :2235-2247
[7]   THE EFFECT OF MAS VARIATION UPON COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IMAGE QUALITY AS EVALUATED BY INVIVO AND INVITRO STUDIES [J].
HAAGA, JR ;
MIRALDI, F ;
MACINTYRE, W ;
LIPUMA, JP ;
BRYAN, PJ ;
WIESEN, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1981, 138 (02) :449-454
[8]   Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT [J].
Huda, W ;
Scalzetti, EM ;
Levin, G .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 (02) :430-435
[9]   An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients [J].
Huda, W ;
Atherton, JV ;
Ware, DE ;
Cumming, WA .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (02) :417-422
[10]   Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: Effect of injection time on time to peak hepatic enhancement [J].
Irie, T ;
Kusano, S .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1996, 20 (04) :633-637