A randomized, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of sodium phosphate tablets with 2L polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for colon cleansing

被引:57
作者
Johanson, John F.
Popp, John W., Jr.
Cohen, Lawrence B.
Lottes, Sandra R.
Forbes, William P.
Walker, Kelli
Carter, Edwin
Zhang, Bing
Rose, Martin
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Rocford Gastroenterol Associates, Rockford, IL 61114 USA
[2] Columbia Gastroenterol Associates, Columbia, SC USA
[3] Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[4] Salix Pharmaceut Inc, Morrisville, NC USA
[5] Kentucky Clin Res, Lexington, KY USA
[6] MacroStat Inc, Delaware, OH USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01363.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy of NaP tablets have not been compared with 2L PEG lavage solution. A multicenter, investigator-blinded study was conducted to compare the colon-cleansing efficacy of a new NaP tablet formulation with that of 2L PEG solution plus bisacodyl tablets in adults undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS: A total of 481 patients were randomized to receive either 32 tablets (48 g) of NaP or 2L PEG solution plus 4 (20 mg) bisacodyl tablets. Quality of colon cleansing was assessed using a 4-point scale (1 = excellent, 2 = good, 3 = fair, and 4 = inadequate), and the primary efficacy end point was mean overall colon-cleansing score. Safety assessments included recording of adverse events and changes in biochemical tests and vital signs. RESULTS: A total of 411 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. The mean overall and ascending colon-cleansing scores for NaP tablets were significantly better than PEG plus bisacodyl (overall 1.5 vs 1.8, ascending 1.4 vs 1.8, P < 0.0001 for both). Patients treated with NaP tablets experienced significantly fewer adverse events (66% vs 82%, P = 0.0003) and gastrointestinal symptoms (64% vs 79%, P = 0.0001) compared with patients receiving PEG plus bisacodyl. Patients receiving NaP tablets were significantly less likely to experience abdominal distention, abdominal pain, and vomiting than patients receiving PEG plus bisacodyl (P < 0.0012). Transient fluctuations in laboratory parameters were observed in both treatment groups; however, the fluctuations were more common and of greater magnitude in the NaP group particularly in phosphorous, sodium, and potassium. CONCLUSION: The colon-cleansing efficacy of the new 32-tablet NaP dosing regimen in this study was found to be significantly better than the 2L PEG solution plus bisacodyl tablets regimen. The 32-tablet NaP dosing regimen was associated with fewer adverse events. As expected electrolyte shifts were more common and of greater magnitude in the NaP group compared with the PEG plus bisacodyl group; however, both treatment groups demonstrated significant changes in electrolytes and creatinine.
引用
收藏
页码:2238 / 2246
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING A NEW SODIUM PHOSPHATE-BISACODYL REGIMEN WITH CONVENTIONAL PEG-ES LAVAGE FOR OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY PREPARATION [J].
AFRIDI, SA ;
BARTHEL, JS ;
KING, PD ;
PINEDA, JJ ;
MARSHALL, JB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (05) :485-489
[2]
Aronchick C., 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P2667
[3]
A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda [J].
Aronchick, CA ;
Lipshutz, WH ;
Wright, SH ;
Dufrayne, F ;
Bergman, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (03) :346-352
[4]
Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy - Timing is the key! [J].
Church, JM .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1998, 41 (10) :1223-1225
[5]
CLARKSTON WK, 1996, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V43, P43
[6]
PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, ENDOSCOPIC-BLINDED TRIAL COMPARING PRECOLONOSCOPY BOWEL CLEANSING METHODS [J].
COHEN, SM ;
WEXNER, SD ;
BINDEROW, SR ;
NOGUERAS, JJ ;
DANIEL, N ;
EHRENPREIS, ED ;
JENSEN, J ;
BONNER, GF ;
RUDERMAN, WB .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1994, 37 (07) :689-696
[7]
Comparison of reduced volume Versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing [J].
DiPalma, JA ;
Wolff, BG ;
Meagher, A ;
Cleveland, MV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (10) :2187-2191
[8]
Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy [J].
Frommer, D .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (01) :100-104
[9]
Efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets compared with PEG solution in colon cleansing: two identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase III trials [J].
Kastenberg, D ;
Chasen, R ;
Choudhary, C ;
Riff, D ;
Steinberg, S ;
Weiss, E ;
Wruble, L .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (06) :705-713
[10]
Efficacy and tolerability of a new formulation of sodium phosphate tablets (INKP-101), and a reduced sodium phosphate dose, in colon cleansing: a single-center open-label pilot trial [J].
Khashab, M ;
Rex, DK .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 21 (04) :465-468