Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: Spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus

被引:35
作者
Bierer, Julie Arenberg [1 ,2 ]
Bierer, Steven M. [3 ]
Middlebrooks, John C. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Bloedel Hearing Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Otolaryngol, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[5] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Neurobiol & Behav, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[6] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Cognit Sci, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
AUDITORY CORTICAL IMAGES; PSYCHOPHYSICAL TUNING CURVES; ELECTRODE-NEURON INTERFACE; CONFIGURATION; CHANNEL; THRESHOLD; INTRACOCHLEAR; ACTIVATION; PATTERNS; DEAFNESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2010.08.006
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
This study examines patterns of neural activity in response to single biphasic electrical pulses, presented alone or following a forward masking pulse train, delivered by a cochlear implant. Recordings were made along the tonotopic axis of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC) in ketamine/xylazine anesthetized guinea pigs. The partial tripolar electrode configuration was used, which provided a systematic way to vary the tonotopic extent of ICC activation between monopolar (broad) and tripolar (narrow) extremes while maintaining the same peak of activation. The forward masking paradigm consisted of a 200 ms masker pulse train (1017 pulses per second) followed 10 ms later by a single-pulse probe stimulus; the current fraction of the probe was set to 0 (monopolar), 1 (tripolar), or 0.5 (hybrid), and the fraction of the masker was fixed at 0.5. Forward masking tuning profiles were derived from the amount of masking current required to just suppress the activity produced by a fixed-level probe. These profiles were sharper for more focused probe configurations, approximating the pattern of neural activity elicited by single (non-masked) pulses. The result helps to bridge the gap between previous findings in animals and recent psychophysical data. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 142
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics
[2]   Auditory cortical images of tones and noise bands [J].
Arenberg, JG ;
Furukawa, S ;
Middlebrooks, JC .
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2000, 1 (02) :183-194
[3]   Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: Comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations [J].
Berenstein, Carlo K. ;
Mens, Lucas H. M. ;
Mulder, Jef J. S. ;
Vanpoucke, Filiep J. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2008, 29 (02) :250-260
[4]   Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: Dependence on electrode configuration [J].
Bierer, JA ;
Middlebrooks, JC .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 87 (01) :478-492
[5]   Identifying Cochlear Implant Channels with Poor Electrode-Neuron Interface: Partial Tripolar, Single-Channel Thresholds and Psychophysical Tuning Curves [J].
Bierer, Julie Arenberg ;
Faulkner, Kathleen F. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (02) :247-258
[6]   Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems [J].
Boëx, C ;
Kós, MI ;
Pelizzone, M .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 114 (04) :2058-2065
[7]   Current focusing and steering: Modeling, physiology, and psychophysics [J].
Bonham, Ben H. ;
Litvak, Leonid M. .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2008, 242 (1-2) :141-153
[8]   Effects of stimulation mode on threshold and loudness growth in multielectrode cochlear implants [J].
Chatterjee, M .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 105 (02) :850-860
[9]   Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients [J].
Chatterjee, M ;
Galvin, JJ ;
Fu, QJ ;
Shannon, RV .
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2006, 7 (01) :15-25
[10]   Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking [J].
Cohen, LT ;
Richardson, LM ;
Saunders, E ;
Cowan, RSC .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2003, 179 (1-2) :72-87