Gunther tulip retrievable vena cava filter: Results from the registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association

被引:167
作者
Millward, SF
Oliva, VL
Bell, SD
Valenti, DA
Rasuli, P
Asch, M
Hadziomerovic, A
Kachura, JR
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, London Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiol, London, ON N6A 3G5, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Radiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Toronto Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Montreal Hosp, Dept Radiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[7] Royal Victoria Hosp, Dept Radiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
embolism; pulmonary; thrombosis; venous; venae cavae; filters;
D O I
10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61590-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To report data collected by the Canadian Registry of the Gunther Tulip Retrievable Filter (GTF). Materials and methods: Between February 1998 and December 2000, 90 patients at eight hospitals underwent implantation of 91 GTFs. There were 45 male patients and 45 female patients, age 17-88 years, with a mean age of 49 years. Indications for filter placement were pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with a contraindication to anticoagulation in 83 patients, prophylaxis after massive PE in one, prophylaxis for proximal free-floating thrombus in one, and prophylaxis with no DVT or PE in six patients (major trauma, n=4; high preoperative risk, n=2). GTF retrieval was attempted in selected patients from a right internal jugular vein approach. Results: One GTF was inadvertently placed in the right iliac vein and could not be retrieved. There were no other major placement complications. GTF retrieval was attempted in 52 patients (53 GTFs); 52 GTFs were successfully retrieved from 51 patients. Implantation times were 2-25 days (mean, 9 d). Of these 51 patients, 37 underwent follow-up for 5-420 days (mean, 103 d) after filter retrieval. Four patients (8% of retrieved GTFs) required reinsertion of a permanent filter 17-167 days (mean, 78 d) after GTF retrieval as a result of bleeding from anticoagulation (n=2) or because the patient required further surgery (n=2). One other patient had recurrent DVT 230 days after retrieval; no PE or other complication was documented in the retrieval group. GTFs were not retrieved from 39 patients for various reasons. Of these 39 patients, 25 underwent follow-up 7-420 days (mean, 85 d) after filter placement. Two patients developed filter occlusion (5%); no other complications were documented. Conclusion: The GTF has a broad range of utility: it can be used as a permanent filter or retrieved after implantation periods of 15 days and possibly longer. However, indications for retrieval require further study, as does the maximum implantation time.
引用
收藏
页码:1053 / 1058
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   SHORT-TERM PROPHYLAXIS OF PULMONARY-EMBOLISM BY USING A RETRIEVABLE VENA-CAVA FILTER [J].
DARCY, MD ;
SMITH, TP ;
HUNTER, DW ;
CASTANEDAZUNIGA, W ;
LUND, G ;
AMPLATZ, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1986, 147 (04) :836-838
[2]   A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis [J].
Decousus, H ;
Leizorovicz, A ;
Parent, F ;
Page, Y ;
Tardy, B ;
Girard, P ;
Laporte, S ;
Faivre, R ;
Charbonnier, B ;
Barral, FG ;
Huet, Y ;
Simonneau, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (07) :409-415
[3]   PERCUTANEOUS INFERIOR VENA-CAVAL FILTERS - FOLLOW-UP OF 7 DESIGNS IN 320 PATIENTS [J].
FERRIS, EJ ;
MCCOWAN, TC ;
CARVER, DK ;
MCFARLAND, DR .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 188 (03) :851-856
[4]   Technical aspects of insertion and removal of an inferior vena cava IVC filter for prophylactic treatment of pulmonary embolus [J].
Khong, PL ;
John, PR .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 1997, 27 (03) :239-241
[5]   Successful retrieval of infected gunther tulip IVC filter [J].
Lin, M ;
Soo, TB ;
Horn, LC .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (10) :1341-1343
[6]   Indications, management, and complications of temporary inferior vena cava filters [J].
Linsenmaier, U ;
Rieger, J ;
Schenk, F ;
Rock, C ;
Mangel, E ;
Pfeifer, KJ .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 21 (06) :464-469
[7]   Current practice of temporary vena cava filter insertion:: A multicenter registry [J].
Lorch, H ;
Welger, D ;
Wagner, V ;
Hillner, B ;
Strecker, EP ;
Herrmann, H ;
Voshage, G ;
Zur, C ;
Schwarzbach, C ;
Schröder, J ;
Gullotta, U ;
Pleissner, J ;
Huttner, S ;
Siering, U ;
Märcklin, C ;
Chavan, A ;
Gläser, F ;
Apitzsch, DE ;
Moubayed, K ;
Leonhardi, J ;
Schuchard, UM ;
Weiss, HD ;
Zwaan, M .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (01) :83-88
[8]   AMPLATZ VENA-CAVAL FILTER - CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE IN 30 PATIENTS [J].
MCCOWAN, TC ;
FERRIS, EJ ;
CARVER, DK ;
BAKER, ML .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (01) :177-181
[9]   Catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: Report of a national multicenter registry [J].
Mewissen, MW ;
Seabrook, GR ;
Meissner, MH ;
Cynamon, J ;
Labropoulos, N ;
Haughton, SH .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (01) :39-49
[10]   Gunther tulip filter: Preliminary clinical experience with retrieval [J].
Millward, SF ;
Bhargava, A ;
Aquino, J ;
Peterson, RA ;
Veinot, JP ;
Bormanis, J ;
Wells, PS .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (01) :75-82