Dosimetric verification of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for radiotherapy treatment planning

被引:63
作者
Bragg, Christopher M. [1 ]
Conway, John
机构
[1] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiotherapy Phys, Weston Pk Hosp, Sheffield S10 2SJ, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Fac Med, Dept Med Phys, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
treatment planning system; dosimetric verification; convolution superposition algorithm; radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2006.10.020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: To investigate the accuracy of photon dose calculations performed by the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm, in homogeneous and inhomogeneous media and in simulated treatment plans. Materials and methods: Predicted dose distributions were compared with ionisation chamber and film measurements for a series of increasingly complex situations. Initially, simple and complex fields in a homogeneous medium were studied. The effect of inhomogeneities was investigated using a range of phantoms constructed of water, bone and lung substitute materials. Simulated treatment plans were then produced using a semi-anthropomorphic phantom and the delivered doses compared to the doses predicted by the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm. Results: In a homogeneous medium, agreement was found to be within 2% dose or 2 mm dta in most instances. In the presence of heterogeneities, agreement was generally to within 2.5%. The simulated treatment plan measurements agreed to within 2.5% or 2 mm. Conclusions: The accuracy of the algorithm was found to be satisfactory at 6 and 10 MV both in homogeneous and inhomogeneous situations and in the simulated treatment plans. The algorithm was more accurate than the Pencil Beam Convolution model, particularly in the presence of low density heterogeneities. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 323
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Dose calculations for external photon beams in radiotherapy [J].
Ahnesjö, A ;
Aspradakis, MM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (11) :R99-R155
[2]   The impact of electron transport on the accuracy of computed dose [J].
Arnfield, MR ;
Siantar, CH ;
Siebers, J ;
Garmon, P ;
Cox, L ;
Mohan, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (06) :1266-1274
[3]   Experimental verification of convolution /superposition photon dose calculations for radiotherapy treatment planning [J].
Aspradakis, MM ;
Morrison, RH ;
Richmond, ND ;
Steele, A .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (17) :2873-2893
[4]  
BRAHME A, 1988, ACTA ONCOL, V27, pS1
[5]   Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium [J].
Carrasco, P ;
Jornet, N ;
Duch, MA ;
Weber, L ;
Ginjaume, M ;
Eudaldo, T ;
Jurado, D ;
Ruiz, A ;
Ribas, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (10) :2899-2911
[6]   Incorporating an improved dose-calculation algorithm in conformal radiotherapy of lung cancer: re-evaluation of dose in normal lung tissue [J].
De Jaeger, K ;
Hoogeman, MS ;
Engelsman, M ;
Seppenwoolde, Y ;
Damen, EMF ;
Mijnheer, BJ ;
Boersma, LJ ;
Lebesque, JV .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 69 (01) :1-10
[7]   Impact of simple tissue inhomogeneity correction algorithms on conformal radiotherapy of lung tumours [J].
Engelsman, M ;
Damen, EMF ;
Koken, PW ;
van 't Veld, AA ;
van Ingen, KM ;
Mijnheer, BJ .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 60 (03) :299-309
[8]   Dosimetric validation of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for photon dose calculation: fundamental characterization in water [J].
Fogliata, A ;
Nicolini, G ;
Vanetti, E ;
Clivio, A ;
Cozzi, L .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (06) :1421-1438
[9]   American Association of Physicists in Medicine radiation therapy committee task group 53: Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning [J].
Fraass, B ;
Doppke, K ;
Hunt, M ;
Kutcher, G ;
Starkschall, G ;
Stern, R ;
Van Dyke, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (10) :1773-1829
[10]  
Gifford Kent A, 2002, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V3, P26, DOI 10.1120/1.1434315