Motor blockade is reduced with ropivacaine 0.125% for parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour

被引:20
作者
Sia, ATH [1 ]
Ruban, P [1 ]
Chong, JL [1 ]
Wong, K [1 ]
机构
[1] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Singapore 229899, Singapore
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE | 1999年 / 46卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF03013195
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the effect on the incidence of motor block by reducing the concentration of ropivacaine from 0.2% to 0.125% in parturient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for labour. Methods: Randomized, controlled and double- blind trial involving parturients in early labour who received demand-only PCEA regimen (bolus 5 ml, lockout 10 min, maximum volume per hour of 20 mi) with either 0.2% (R0.2 group, n = 25) or 0.125% (R0.125 group, n = 25) ropivacaine. Pain scores, the degree of motor block, the rate of drug consumption, the proportion of good to total PCEA demands and the overall satisfaction scores were documented. Results: Fewer parturients in the R0.125 group had lower limb motor block (4 vs 11, P < 0.05) although the degree of block was mild in ail the affected parturients, The ratio of good to total PCEA demands was more favourable in the R0.2% group (median 0.72 vs 0.52, P < 0.01) although the hourly rate of ropivacaine consumption, the degree of pain relief, the maternal-fetal outcome and the overall satisfaction scores were similar. Conclusion: Both ropivacaine 0.2% and 0.125% provided comparably effective analgesia but motor block occurred more commonly in the 0.2% group.
引用
收藏
页码:1019 / 1023
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Effects of diluent volume of a single dose of epidural bupivacaine in parturients during the first stage of labor [J].
Christiaens, F ;
Verborgh, C ;
Dierick, A ;
Camu, F .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1998, 23 (02) :134-141
[2]   ALTERED NEURAL CONDUCTION WITH EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE [J].
CUSICK, JF ;
MYKLEBUST, JB ;
ABRAM, SE ;
DAVIDSON, A .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1982, 57 (01) :31-36
[3]   A double-blind comparison of 0.25 % ropivacaine and 0.25 % bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour [J].
Eddleston, JM ;
Holland, JJ ;
Griffin, RP ;
Corbett, A ;
Horsman, EL ;
Reynolds, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 (01) :66-71
[4]  
FERRANTE FM, 1994, ANESTH ANALG, V79, P80
[5]   PATIENT-CONTROLLED EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOR - VARYING BOLUS DOSE AND LOCKOUT INTERVAL [J].
GAMBLING, DR ;
HUBER, CJ ;
BERKOWITZ, J ;
HOWELL, P ;
SWENERTON, JE ;
ROSS, PLE ;
CROCHETIERE, CT ;
PAVY, TJG .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1993, 40 (03) :211-217
[6]   A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF PATIENT CONTROLLED EPIDURAL ANALGESIA (PCEA) AND CONTINUOUS INFUSION EPIDURAL ANALGESIA (CIEA) DURING LABOR [J].
GAMBLING, DR ;
YU, P ;
COLE, C ;
MCMORLAND, GH ;
PALMER, L .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1988, 35 (03) :249-254
[7]   Comparison of three solutions of ropivacaine/fentanyl for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia [J].
Liu, SS ;
Moore, JM ;
Luo, AM ;
Trautman, WJ ;
Carpenter, RL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (03) :727-733
[8]   0.125% ropivacaine is similar to 0.125% bupivacaine for labor analgesia using patient-controlled epidural infusion [J].
Owen, MD ;
D'Angelo, R ;
Gerancher, JC ;
Thompson, JM ;
Foss, ML ;
Babb, JD ;
Eisenach, JC .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (03) :527-531
[9]  
Paech M J, 1996, Int J Obstet Anesth, V5, P115, DOI 10.1016/S0959-289X(96)80010-0
[10]   Epidural 0.2% ropivacaine for labour analgesia: Parturient-controlled or continuous infusion? [J].
Sia, AT ;
Chong, JL .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1999, 27 (02) :154-158