Conventional and CT angiography in children: dosimetry and dose comparisons

被引:34
作者
Frush, Donald P.
Yoshizumi, Terry
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol,Div Pediat Radiol, McGovern Davison Childrens Hlth Ctr 1905, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Radiat Safety Div, Durham, NC USA
关键词
ALARA; CT radiation; cardiac angiography; infants and children;
D O I
10.1007/s00247-006-0190-6
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 [儿科学];
摘要
Tremendous advances have been made in imaging in children with both congenital and acquired heart disease. These include technical advances in cardiac catheterization and conventional angiography, especially with advancements in interventional procedures, as well as noninvasive imaging with MR and CT angiography. With rapid advances in multidetector CT (MDCT) technology, most recently 64-detector array systems (64-slice MDCT), have come a number of advantages over MR. However, both conventional and CT angiography impart radiation dose to children. Although the presence of radiation exposure to children has long been recognized, it is apparent that our ability to assess this dose, particularly in light of the rapid advancements, has been limited. Traditional methods of dosimetry for both conventional and CT angiography are somewhat cumbersome or involve a potential for substantial uncertainty. Recent developments in dosimetry, including metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFET) and the availability of anthropomorphic, tissue-equivalent phantoms have provided new opportunities for dosimetric assessments. Recent work with this technology in state-of-the-art cardiac angiography suites as well as with MDCT have offered direct comparisons of doses in infants and children undergoing diagnostic cardiac evaluation. It is with these dose data that assessment of risks, and ultimately the assessment of risk-benefit, can be better achieved.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 158
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
Estimating the effective dose to children undergoing heart investigations - a phantom study [J].
Axelsson, B ;
Khalil, C ;
Lidegran, M ;
Schuwert, P ;
Mortensson, W .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 72 (856) :378-383
[2]
Patient-specific dose and radiation risk estimation in pediatric cardiac catheterization [J].
Bacher, K ;
Bogaert, E ;
Lapere, R ;
De Wolf, D ;
Thierens, H .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 111 (01) :83-89
[3]
Radiation exposure to children during cardiac catheterization [J].
Boothroyd, A ;
McDonald, E ;
Moores, BM ;
Sluming, V ;
Carty, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 :180-185
[4]
Is it time to retire the CTDI for CT quality assurance and dose optimization? [J].
Brenner, DJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (10) :3225-3226
[5]
Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD ;
Hall, EJ ;
Berdon, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :289-296
[6]
BRODY AS, 2006, IN PRESS PEDIATRICS
[7]
Quantifying and minimizing radiation exposure during pediatric cardiac catheterization [J].
Campbell, RM ;
Strieper, MJ ;
Frias, PA ;
Jeager, G ;
Balfour, G ;
Costello, L ;
Sullivan, KM .
PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 26 (01) :29-33
[8]
*DEP HLTH HUM SERV, 2006, 11 PHS NAT TOX PROGR
[9]
Pediatric multidetector body CT [J].
Donnelly, LF ;
Frush, DP .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 41 (03) :637-+
[10]
Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: Strategies at a large children's hospital [J].
Donnelly, LF ;
Emery, KH ;
Brody, AS ;
Laor, T ;
Gylys-Morin, VM ;
Anton, CG ;
Thomas, SR ;
Frush, DP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :303-306