High precision anatomy for MEG

被引:56
作者
Troebinger, Luzia [1 ]
David Lopez, Jose [3 ]
Lutti, Antoine [1 ,4 ]
Bradbury, David [1 ]
Bestmann, Sven [2 ]
Barnes, Gareth [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Wellcome Trust Ctr Neuroimaging, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] UCL, UCL Inst Neurol, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, London WC1N 3BG, England
[3] Univ Antioquia, Dept Elect Engn, Medellin, Colombia
[4] Univ Lausanne, CHUV, Dept Clin Neurosci, Lab Rech Neuroimagerie, Lausanne, Switzerland
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Magnetoencephalography; Spatial resolution; Coregistration; Longitudinal MEG; Head movement; MEG; MSP; 3D printer;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.065
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Precise MEG estimates of neuronal current flow are undermined by uncertain knowledge of the head location with respect to the MEG sensors. This is either due to head movements within the scanning session or systematic errors in co-registration to anatomy. Here we show how such errors can be minimized using subject-specific head-casts produced using 3D printing technology. The casts fit the scalp of the subject internally and the inside of the MEG dewar externally, reducing within session and between session head movements. Systematic errors in matching to MRI coordinate system are also reduced through the use of MRI-visible fiducial markers placed on the same cast. Bootstrap estimates of absolute co-registration error were of the order of 1 mm. Estimates of relative co-registration error were <1.5 mm between sessions. We corroborated these scalp based estimates by looking at the MEG data recorded over a 6 month period. We found that the between session sensor variability of the subject's evoked response was of the order of the within session noise, showing no appreciable noise due to between-session movement. Simulations suggest that the between-session sensor level amplitude SNR improved by a factor of 5 over conventional strategies. We show that at this level of coregistration accuracy there is strong evidence for anatomical models based on the individual rather than canonical anatomy; but that this advantage disappears for errors of greater than 5 mm. This work paves the way for source reconstruction methods which can exploit very high SNR signals and accurate anatomical models; and also significantly increases the sensitivity of longitudinal studies with MEG. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 591
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Co-registration of magnetoencephalography with magnetic resonance imaging using bite-bar-based fiducials and surface-matching
    Adjamian, P
    Barnes, GR
    Hillebrand, A
    Holliday, IE
    Singh, KD
    Furlong, PL
    Harrington, E
    Barclay, CW
    Route, PJG
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 115 (03) : 691 - 698
  • [2] The use of an MEG device as 3D digitizer and motion monitoring system
    de Munck, JC
    Verbunt, JPA
    Van't Ent, D
    Van Dijk, BW
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (08) : 2041 - 2052
  • [3] RAPID 3-DIMENSIONAL MR IMAGING USING THE FLASH TECHNIQUE
    FRAHM, J
    HAASE, A
    MATTHAEI, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1986, 10 (02) : 363 - 368
  • [4] Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem
    Friston, Karl J.
    Harrison, Lee
    Daunizeau, Jean
    Kiebel, Stefan
    Phillips, Christophe
    Trujillo-Barreto, Nelson
    Henson, Richard
    Flandin, Guillaume
    Mattout, Jeremie
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2008, 39 (03) : 1104 - 1120
  • [5] Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research
    Gross, Joachim
    Baillet, Sylvain
    Barnes, Gareth R.
    Henson, Richard N.
    Hillebrand, Arjan
    Jensen, Ole
    Jerbi, Karim
    Litvak, Vladimir
    Maess, Burkhard
    Oostenveld, Robert
    Parkkonen, Lauri
    Taylor, Jason R.
    van Wassenhove, Virginie
    Wibral, Michael
    Schoffelen, Jan-Mathijs
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2013, 65 : 349 - 363
  • [6] Quantitative FLASH MRI at 3T using a rational approximation of the Ernst equation
    Helms, Gunther
    Dathe, Henning
    Dechent, Peter
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2008, 59 (03) : 667 - 672
  • [7] Selecting forward models for MEG source-reconstruction using model-evidence
    Henson, R. N.
    Mattout, J.
    Phillips, C.
    Friston, K. J.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 46 (01) : 168 - 176
  • [8] Practical constraints on estimation of source extent with MEG beamformers
    Hillebrand, Arjan
    Barnes, Gareth R.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 54 (04) : 2732 - 2740
  • [9] A general Bayesian treatment for MEG source reconstruction incorporating lead field uncertainty
    Lopez, J. D.
    Penny, W. D.
    Espinosa, J. J.
    Barnes, G. R.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 60 (02) : 1194 - 1204
  • [10] Mattout Jeremie, 2007, Comput Intell Neurosci, P67613, DOI 10.1155/2007/67613