Direct aperture optimization for IMRT using Monte Carlo generated beamlets

被引:41
作者
Bergman, Alanah M. [1 ]
Bush, Karl
Milette, Marie-Pierre
Popescu, I. Antoniu
Otto, Karl
Duzenli, Cheryl
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Phys & Astron, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Univ Victoria, Dept Phys & Astron, Victoria, BC, Canada
[3] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Vancouver Ctr, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
IMRT optimization; Monte Carlo; direct aperture optimization; beamlet dose distribution; tissue inhomogeneity;
D O I
10.1118/1.2336509
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This work introduces an EGSnrc-based Monte Carlo (MC) beamlet does distribution matrix into a direct aperture optimization (DAO) algorithm for IMRT inverse planning. The technique is referred to as Monte Carlo-direct aperture optimization (MC-DAO). The goal is to assess if the combination of accurate Monte Carlo tissue inhomogeneity modeling and DAO inverse planning will improve the dose accuracy and treatment efficiency for treatment planning. Several authors have shown that the presence of small fields and/or inhomogeneous materials in IMRT treatment fields can cause dose calculation errors for algorithms that are unable to accurately model electronic disequilibrium. This issue may also affect the IMRT optimization process because the dose calculation algorithm may not properly model difficult geometries such as targets close to low-density regions (lung, air etc.). A clinical linear accelerator head is simulated using BEAMnrc (NRC, Canada). A novel in-house algorithm subdivides the resulting phase space into 2.5 X 5.0 mm(2) beamlets. Each beamlet is projected onto a patient-specific phantom. The beamlet dose contribution to each voxel in a structure-of-interest is calculated using DOSXYZnrc. The multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf positions are linked to the location of the beamlet does distributions. The MLC shapes are optimized using direct aperture optimization (DAO). A final Monte Carlo calculation with MLC modeling is used to compute the final dose distribution. Monte Carlo simulation can generate accurate beamlet dose distributions for traditionally difficult-to-calculate geometries, particularly for small fields crossing regions of tissue inhomogeneity. The introduction of DAO results in an additional improvement by increasing the treatment delivery efficiency. For the examples presented in this paper the reduction in the total number of monitor units to deliver is similar to 33% compared to fluence-based optimization methods. 2006 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:3666 / 3679
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Energy modulated electron therapy using a few leaf electron collimator in combination with IMRT and 3D-CRT: Monte Carlo-based planning and dosimetric evaluation [J].
Al-Yahya, K ;
Schwartz, M ;
Shenouda, G ;
Verhaegen, F ;
Freeman, C ;
Seuntjens, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (09) :2976-2986
[2]   Optimization of IMRT [J].
Alber, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 :S101-S101
[3]   Ionization chamber-based reference dosimetry of intensity modulated radiation beams [J].
Bouchard, H ;
Seuntjens, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (09) :2454-2465
[4]   OPTIMIZATION OF STATIONARY AND MOVING BEAM RADIATION-THERAPY TECHNIQUES [J].
BRAHME, A .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1988, 12 (02) :129-140
[5]  
Chui C S, 2001, Med Dosim, V26, P189, DOI 10.1016/S0958-3947(01)00069-3
[6]   Modelling an extreme water-lung interface using a single pencil beam algorithm and the Monte Carlo method [J].
Cranmer-Sargison, G ;
Beckham, WA ;
Popescu, IA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (08) :1557-1567
[7]   Leaf position optimization for step-and-shoot IMRT [J].
De Gersem, W ;
Claus, F ;
De Wagter, C ;
Van Duyse, B ;
De Neve, W .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (05) :1371-1388
[8]   A software toes for the quantitative evaluation of 3D dose calculation algorithms [J].
Harms, WB ;
Low, DA ;
Wong, JW ;
Purdy, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (10) :1830-1836
[9]   Optimizer convergence and local minima errors and their clinical importance [J].
Jeraj, R ;
Wu, CA ;
Mackie, TR .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (17) :2809-2827
[10]   Monte Carlo-based inverse treatment planning [J].
Jeraj, R ;
Keall, P .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (08) :1885-1896