Ropivacaine, 0.1% plus sufentanil, 0.5 μg/ml, versus bupivacaine, 0.1% plus sufentanil, 0.5 μg/ml, using patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor -: A double-blind comparison

被引:57
作者
Fischer, C
Blanié, P
Jaouën, E
Vayssière, C
Kaloul, I
Coltat, JC
机构
[1] Poissy Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Poissy, France
[2] Poissy Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Poissy, France
关键词
analgesia for labor pain; obstetric anesthesia;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-200006000-00015
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: This study compared the administration of 0.1% ropivacaine and 0.5 mu g/ml sufentanil with that of 0.1% bupivacaine and 0.5 mu g/ml sufentanil via patient-controlled epidural analgesia route during labor. Methods: Two hundred healthy pregnant women at term with a single fetus with a vertex fetal presentation were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either 0.1% ropivacaine and 0.5 mu g/ml sufentanil or 0.1% bupivacaine and 0.5 mu g/ml sufentanil using a patient-controlled epidural analgesia pump (5-ml bolus dose, 10-min locked-out period, no basal infusion). Pain score on a visual analog scale, Bromage score (0-3), level of sensory block, patient-controlled epidural analgesia ratio, drug use, supplemental boluses, and side effects were recorded at 30 min and then hourly. Mode of delivery, duration of first and second stages of labor, umbilical cord pH, Apgar scores of the newborn, and a measure of maternal satisfaction were recorded after delivery. Results: No differences were seen between the two groups for pain scores on a visual analog scale during labor, volume of anesthetic solution used, mode of delivery, or side effects. Motor block during the first stage of labor was significantly less in the ropivacaine group than in the bupivacaine group (no motor block in 97.8 of patients vs. 88.3%, respectively; P < 0.01), Duration of the second stage of labor was shorter in the ropivacaine group (1.3 +/- 1.0 vs, 1.5 +/- 1.2 h [mean +/- SD]; P < 0.05). Maternal satisfaction was greater in the bupivacaine group (91 +/- 13 mm for contraction, 89 +/- 19 mm for delivery on a visual scale: 0 = not satisfied at all, 100 = fully satisfied) than in the ropivacaine group (84 +/- 21 and 80 +/- 25 mm; P < 0.0001), Patients in the ropivacaine group requested more supplemental boluses to achieve analgesia during the second stage of labor than those in the bupivacaine group (29.7 vs, 19.8%, respectively, requested one or more supplemental boluses; P < 0.05). Conclusions: Delivered as patient-controlled epidural analgesia, 0.1% ropivacaine and 0.5 mu g/ml sufentanil produce less motor block but are clinically less potent than 0.1% bupivacaine and 0.5 mu g/ml sufentanil.
引用
收藏
页码:1588 / 1593
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Continuous extradural infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg ml(-1) for pain relief during labour [J].
Benhamou, D ;
Hamza, J ;
Eledjam, JJ ;
Dailland, P ;
Palot, M ;
Seebacher, J ;
Milon, D ;
Heeroma, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 78 (06) :748-750
[2]   Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour [J].
Capogna, G ;
Celleno, D ;
Fusco, P ;
Lyons, G ;
Columb, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (03) :371-373
[3]   A double-blind comparison of 0.25 % ropivacaine and 0.25 % bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour [J].
Eddleston, JM ;
Holland, JJ ;
Griffin, RP ;
Corbett, A ;
Horsman, EL ;
Reynolds, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 (01) :66-71
[4]   A double-blind comparison of 0.125% ropivacaine with sufentanil and 0.125% bupivacaine with sufentanil for epidural labor analgesia [J].
Gautier, P ;
De Kock, M ;
Van Steenberge, A ;
Fanard, L ;
Hody, JL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (03) :772-778
[5]   COMPARISON OF ROPIVACAINE AND BUPIVACAINE IN EXTRADURAL ANALGESIA FOR THE RELIEF OF PAIN IN LABOR [J].
MCCRAE, AF ;
JOZWIAK, H ;
MCCLURE, JH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 74 (03) :261-265
[6]   Double-blind comparison of epidural ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25%, for the relief of childbirth pain [J].
Muir, HA ;
Writer, D ;
Douglas, J ;
Weeks, S ;
Gambling, D ;
Macarthur, A .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1997, 44 (06) :599-604
[7]   0.125% ropivacaine is similar to 0.125% bupivacaine for labor analgesia using patient-controlled epidural infusion [J].
Owen, MD ;
D'Angelo, R ;
Gerancher, JC ;
Thompson, JM ;
Foss, ML ;
Babb, JD ;
Eisenach, JC .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (03) :527-531
[8]   Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor - Implications for therapeutic indexes [J].
Polley, LS ;
Columb, MO ;
Naughton, NN ;
Wagner, DS ;
van de Ven, CJM .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (04) :944-950
[9]   Epidural infusion of low-dose bupivacaine and opioid in labour - Does reducing motor block increase the spontaneous delivery rate? [J].
Russell, R ;
Reynolds, F .
ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 51 (03) :266-273
[10]   ACUTE TOXICITY OF ROPIVACAINE COMPARED WITH THAT OF BUPIVACAINE [J].
SCOTT, DB ;
LEE, A ;
FAGAN, D ;
BOWLER, GMR ;
BLOOMFIELD, P ;
LUNDH, R .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1989, 69 (05) :563-569