Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4-and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography

被引:244
作者
Schulze, D
Heiland, M
Thurmann, H
Adam, G
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Oral Radiol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Radiat Therapy, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
radiation exposure; computed tomography; cone beam computed tomography; conventional radiography;
D O I
10.1259/dmfr/28403350
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: Radiation doses were determined to balance risks against usefulness of the different modalities available for the imaging of the facial skeleton. Methods: An Alderson Rando Phantom, armed with lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) was exposed using a set of four conventional radiographs (orbital view, modified Waters view, orthopantomography, skull posterior-anterior 0degrees), two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) (NewTom 9000 and Siremobil Iso-C-3D), and multislice computed tomography (CT) modalities (Somatom VolumeZoom and Somatom Sensation 16). TLDs from 14 well defined anatomical sites lying within the primary beam as well as the TLD corresponding to the thyroid gland were evaluated. Results: Multislice CT showed the highest exposure values. Exposure levels of the CBCT sytems lay between CT and conventional radiography. Dose measurement for the 16-slice CT revealed nearly the same radiation exposure as the 4-slice system when adapted examination protocols were used. Conclusions: Selection of the most appropriate imaging modality should be performed in view of the delivered doses, required image quality and information and the clinical circumstances.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 86
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   In vivo, thyroid and lens surface exposure with spiral and conventional computed tomography in dental implant radiography [J].
Bianchi, J ;
Goggins, W ;
Rudolph, M .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2000, 90 (02) :249-253
[2]   Radiation dose in dental radiology [J].
Cohnen, M ;
Kemper, J ;
Möbes, O ;
Pawelzik, J ;
Mödder, U .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) :634-637
[3]  
Ekestubbe A, 1993, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, V22, P13
[4]   New technical developments in multislice CT - Part 1: Approaching isotropic resolution with sub-millimeter 16-slice scanning [J].
Flohr, T ;
Stierstorfer, K ;
Bruder, H ;
Simon, J ;
Schaller, S .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2002, 174 (07) :839-845
[5]   3D-imaging of the facial skeleton with an isocentric mobile C-arm system (Siremobil ISO-C3D) [J].
Heiland, M ;
Schulze, D ;
Adam, G ;
Schmelzle, R .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 32 (01) :21-25
[6]   Intraoperative computed tomography with the mobile CT Tomoscan M during surgical treatment of orbital fractures [J].
Hoelzle, F ;
Klein, M ;
Schwerdtner, O ;
Lueth, T ;
Albrecht, J ;
Hosten, N ;
Felix, R ;
Bier, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 30 (01) :26-31
[7]  
Hoffmann J, 2002, Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir, V6, P346
[8]   ABSORBED DOSE DETERMINATION FOR TOMOGRAPHIC IMPLANT SITE ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES [J].
KASSEBAUM, DK ;
STOLLER, NE ;
MCDAVID, WD ;
GOSHORN, B ;
AHRENS, CR .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1992, 73 (04) :502-509
[9]   Three-dimensional CT with a modified C-arm image intensifier: Feasibility [J].
Linsenmaier, U ;
Rock, C ;
Euler, E ;
Wirth, S ;
Brandl, R ;
Kotsianos, D ;
Mutschler, W ;
Pfeifer, KJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (01) :286-292
[10]   AVERAGE RADIATION-DOSES IN A STANDARD HEAD EXAMINATION FOR 250-CT SYSTEMS [J].
MCCROHAN, JL ;
PATTERSON, JF ;
GAGNE, RM ;
GOLDSTEIN, HA .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 163 (01) :263-268