Monte Carlo evaluation of the AAA treatment planning algorithm in a heterogeneous multilayer phantom and IMRT clinical treatments for an Elekta SL25 linear accelerator

被引:72
作者
Sterpin, E.
Tomsej, M.
De Smedt, B.
Reynaert, N.
Vynckier, S.
机构
[1] St Luc Univ Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Med Phys, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2727314
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) is a new pencil beam convolution/superposition algorithm proposed by Varian for photon dose calculations. The configuration of AAA depends on linear accelerator design and specifications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of AAA for an Elekta SL25 linear accelerator for small fields and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatments in inhomogeneous media. The accuracy of AAA was evaluated in two studies. First, AAA was compared both with Monte Carlo (MC) and the measurements in an inhomogeneous phantom simulating lung equivalent tissues and bone ribs. The algorithm was tested under lateral electronic disequilibrium conditions, using small fields (2 x 2 cm(2)). Good agreement was generally achieved for depth dose and profiles, with deviations generally below 3% in lung inhomogeneities and below 5% at interfaces. However, the effects of attenuation and scattering close to the bone ribs were not fully taken into account by AAA, and small inhomogeneities may lead to planning errors. Second, AAA and MC were compared for IMRT plans in clinical conditions, i.e., dose calculations in a computed tomography scan of a patient. One ethmoid tumor, one orophaxynx and two lung tumors are presented in this paper. Small differences were found between the dose volume histograms. For instance, a 1.7% difference for the mean planning target volume dose was obtained for the ethmoid case. Since better agreement was achieved for the same plans but in homogeneous conditions, these differences must be attributed to the handling of inhomogeneities by AAA. Therefore, inherent assumptions of the algorithm, principally the assumption of independent depth and lateral directions in the scaling of the kernels, were slightly influencing AAA's validity in inhomogeneities. However, AAA showed a good accuracy overall and a great ability to handle small fields in inhomogeneous media compared to other pencil beam convolution algorithms. (c) 2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1665 / 1677
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   COLLAPSED CONE CONVOLUTION OF RADIANT ENERGY FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION IN HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA [J].
AHNESJO, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (04) :577-592
[2]   The impact of electron transport on the accuracy of computed dose [J].
Arnfield, MR ;
Siantar, CH ;
Siebers, J ;
Garmon, P ;
Cox, L ;
Mohan, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (06) :1266-1274
[3]   Experimental verification of convolution /superposition photon dose calculations for radiotherapy treatment planning [J].
Aspradakis, MM ;
Morrison, RH ;
Richmond, ND ;
Steele, A .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (17) :2873-2893
[4]   IMRT head and neck treatment planning with a commercially available Monte Carlo based planning system [J].
Boudreau, C ;
Heath, E ;
Seuntjens, J ;
Ballivy, O ;
Parker, W .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (05) :879-890
[5]   Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium [J].
Carrasco, P ;
Jornet, N ;
Duch, MA ;
Weber, L ;
Ginjaume, M ;
Eudaldo, T ;
Jurado, D ;
Ruiz, A ;
Ribas, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (10) :2899-2911
[6]   Investigation of Kodak extended dose range (EDR) film for megavoltage photon beam dosimetry [J].
Chetty, IJ ;
Charland, PM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (20) :3629-3641
[7]   Comparative evaluation of Kodak EDR2 and XV2 films for verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy [J].
Dogan, N ;
Leybovich, LB ;
Sethi, A .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (22) :4121-4130
[8]   Dosimetric validation of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for photon dose calculation: fundamental characterization in water [J].
Fogliata, A ;
Nicolini, G ;
Vanetti, E ;
Clivio, A ;
Cozzi, L .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (06) :1421-1438
[9]   American Association of Physicists in Medicine radiation therapy committee task group 53: Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning [J].
Fraass, B ;
Doppke, K ;
Hunt, M ;
Kutcher, G ;
Starkschall, G ;
Stern, R ;
Van Dyke, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (10) :1773-1829
[10]   Comparison of inhomogeneity correction algorithms in small photon fields [J].
Jones, AO ;
Das, IJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (03) :766-776