Image Quality in a Low Radiation Exposure Protocol for Retrospectively ECG-Gated Coronary CT Angiography

被引:109
作者
Pflederer, Tobias [1 ]
Rudofsky, Larissa [1 ]
Ropers, Dieter [1 ]
Bachmann, Sven [1 ]
Marwan, Mohamed [1 ]
Daniel, Werner G. [1 ]
Achenbach, Stephan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Internal Med Cardiol 2, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
coronary CT angiography; image quality; radiation dose; tube voltage; 64-SLICE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; DUAL-SOURCE CT; MULTIDETECTOR ROW CT; ARTERY VISUALIZATION; CARDIOLOGY; PATIENT; FEASIBILITY; PERFORMANCE; COLLIMATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.08.1025
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to systematically compare the image quality of dual-source CT coronary angiography using 100 kV instead of 120 kV. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. One hundred patients with a body weight = 85 kg were included. A dual-source CT scanner was used (330-milliseconds rotation, 0.6-mm collimation, 56 +/- 7 mL of IV contrast agent at 5 mL/s). Each patient was randomized either to scanning protocol group 1 (120 kV and 330 mAs) or protocol group 2 (100 kV and 330 mAs). ECG pulsing was used for all patients. Data sets were assessed by two independent observers for image quality, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise-ratio. Effective dose was determined based on dose-length product. RESULTS. There were no significant differences in body weight or heart rate between the two groups (70 +/- 10 kg and 57 +/- 8 bpm [beats per minute] vs 70 +/- 9 kg and 59 +/- 8 bpm). Use of 100 kV led to significant reduction of radiation exposure (group 1: 12.7 +/- 1.7 mSv; volume CT dose index [CTDI(vol)], 47.8 +/- 6.1 mGy and group 2: 7.8 +/- 2.0 mSv; CTDI(vol), 28.6 +/- 6.3 mGy; p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement in assessing image quality (kappa = 0.71) was close. Mean patient-based image quality scores were not significantly different (group 1, 2.7 +/- 0.5 and group 2, 2.6 +/- 0.4; p = 0.75). Also, vessel-based scores showed no significant differences. Beyond the level of significance, group 1 and group 2 showed one and two nonassessable patients and two and three nonassessable vessels, respectively. Mean intraluminal attenuation, contrast enhancement, and image noise were significantly higher for 100 kV, whereas signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise-ratios were not different between the two scanning protocols. CONCLUSION. The use of lower tube voltage leads to significant reduction in radiation exposure in noninvasive coronary CT angiography. Image quality in nonobese patients is not negatively influenced.
引用
收藏
页码:1045 / 1050
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   MDCT of the coronary arteries: Feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose [J].
Abada, Hicham T. ;
Larchez, Christophe ;
Daoud, Beatrice ;
Sigal-Cinqualbre, Anne ;
Paul, Jean-Francois .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (06) :S387-S390
[2]   Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography - Initial experience [J].
Achenbach, S ;
Ropers, D ;
Kuettner, A ;
Flohr, T ;
Ohnesorge, B ;
Bruder, H ;
Theessen, H ;
Karakaya, M ;
Daniel, WG ;
Bautz, W ;
Kalender, WA ;
Anders, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 57 (03) :331-335
[3]   Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16 x 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation [J].
Achenbach, S ;
Ropers, D ;
Pohle, FK ;
Raaz, D ;
von Erffa, J ;
Yilmaz, A ;
Muschiol, G ;
Daniel, WG .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (19) :1978-1986
[4]   Comparison of image quality in contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by electron beam tomography and retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral computed tomography [J].
Achenbach, S ;
Giesler, T ;
Ropers, D ;
Ulzheimer, S ;
Anders, K ;
Wenkel, E ;
Pohle, K ;
Kachelriess, M ;
Derlien, H ;
Kalender, WA ;
Daniel, WG ;
Bautz, W ;
Baum, U .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (02) :119-128
[5]   Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography - A scientific statement from the American Heart Association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention, council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology [J].
Budoff, Matthew J. ;
Achenbach, Stephan ;
Blumenthal, Roger S. ;
Carr, J. Jeffrey ;
Goldin, Jonathan G. ;
Greenland, Philip ;
Guerci, Alan D. ;
Lima, Joao A. C. ;
Rader, Daniel J. ;
Rubin, Geoffrey D. ;
Shaw, Leslee J. ;
Wiegers, Susan E. .
CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (16) :1761-1791
[6]   Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography [J].
Coles, DR ;
Smail, MA ;
Negus, IS ;
Wilde, P ;
Oberhoff, M ;
Karsch, KR ;
Baumbach, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (09) :1840-1845
[7]   Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography [J].
Einstein, Andrew J. ;
Henzlova, Milena J. ;
Rajagopalan, Sanjay .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 298 (03) :317-323
[8]   Effect of dose-reduced scan protocols on cardiac coronary image quality with 64-row MDCT: A cardiac phantom study [J].
Fei, Xiaolu ;
Du, Xiangying ;
Li, Pengyu ;
Liao, Jingmin ;
Shen, Yun ;
Li, Kuncheng .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 67 (01) :85-91
[9]   Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries [J].
Ferencik, M ;
Nomura, CH ;
Maurovich-Horvat, P ;
Hoffmann, U ;
Pena, AJ ;
Cury, RC ;
Abbara, S ;
Nieman, K ;
Fatima, U ;
Achenbach, S ;
Brady, TJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 57 (03) :373-379
[10]   Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice -: Impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates [J].
Hausleiter, J ;
Meyer, T ;
Hadamitzky, M ;
Huber, E ;
Zankl, M ;
Martinoff, S ;
Kastrati, A ;
Schömig, A .
CIRCULATION, 2006, 113 (10) :1305-1310