Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification - A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引：243

作者：

Frewer, Lynn J. ^{[1
]}

van der Lans, Ivo A. ^{[2
]}

Fischer, Arnout R. H. ^{[2
]}

Reinders, Machiel J. ^{[3
]}

Menozzi, Davide ^{[4
]}

Zhang, Xiaoyong ^{[3
]}

van den Berg, Isabelle ^{[3
]}

Zimmermann, Karin L. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Agr Food & Rural Dev, Ctr Rural Econ, Food & Soc Grp, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England

[2] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands

[3] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, LEI, Res Area Consumer & Behav, NL-2502 LS The Hague, Netherlands

[4] Univ Parma, Dept Econ, I-43125 Parma, Italy

来源：

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY | 2013年 / 30卷 / 02期

基金：

欧盟第七框架计划;

关键词：

CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE; ATTITUDES; RISK; TECHNOLOGIES; DETERMINANTS; WILLINGNESS; BENEFITS; ETHICS; EUROPE;

D O I：

10.1016/j.tifs.2013.01.003

中图分类号：

TS2 [食品工业];

学科分类号：

0832 ;

摘要：

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess research relevant to understanding consumer and societal attitudes to genetic modification applied to agri-food production. The objective was to compare attitudes in different global regions, at different times and between applications. Seventy articles were included in the final meta-analysis. Plant-related or "general" applications were more acceptable than animal-related applications. Risk perceptions were greater in Europe than North America and Asia. The reverse was true of benefit perceptions. Moral concerns are higher in North America and Asia. Both risk and benefit perceptions increased with time.

引用

页码：142 / 152

页数：11

共 39 条

[11] Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods: The mediating role of trust [J].

Frewer, LJ ;

Scholderer, J ;

Bredahl, L .

RISK ANALYSIS, 2003, 23 (06) :1117-1133

[12] Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: Risk, benefit, and ethics [J].

Frewer, LJ ;

Howard, C ;

Shepherd, R .

SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 1997, 22 (01) :98-124

[13] RETRACTED: Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the US (Retracted Article) [J].

Gaskell, G ;

Bauer, MW ;

Durant, J ;

Allum, NC .

SCIENCE, 1999, 285 (5426) :384-387

[14] Consumer Acceptance of Second-Generation GM Foods: The Case of Biofortified Cassava in the North-east of Brazil [J].

Gonzalez, Carolina ;

Johnson, Nancy ;

Qaim, Matin .

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 60 (03) :604-624

[15] Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations [J].

Greenhalgh, T ;

Robert, G ;

Macfarlane, F ;

Bate, P ;

Kyriakidou, O .

MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2004, 82 (04) :581-629

[16]

Greenhalgh T., 2005, DIFFUSION OF INNOVAT

[17] Consumer attitudes to genetically modified food in Norway [J].

Grimsrud, KM ;

McCluskey, JJ ;

Loureiro, ML ;

Wahl, TI .

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 55 (01) :75-90

[18] Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: A review [J].

Gupta, Nidhi ;

Fischer, Arnout R. H. ;

Frewer, Lynn J. .

PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2012, 21 (07) :782-795

[19]

Horlick-Jones T., 2007, THE GM DEBATE RISK P

[20] The quality of food risk management in Europe: Perspectives and priorities [J].

Houghton, J. R. ;

Rowe, G. ;

Frewer, L. J. ;

Van Kleef, E. ;

Chryssochoidis, G. ;

Kehagia, O. ;

Korzen-Bohr, S. ;

Lassen, J. ;

Pfenning, U. ;

Strada, A. .

FOOD POLICY, 2008, 33 (01) :13-26

← 1 2 3 4 →