Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique:: how precise is navigation in clinical routine?

被引:104
作者
Tingart, Markus [1 ]
Luering, Christian [1 ]
Baethis, Holger [2 ]
Beckmann, Johannes [1 ]
Grifka, Joachim [1 ]
Perlick, Lars [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Asklepios Klinikum, D-93077 Bad Abbach, Germany
[2] Univ Witten Herdecke, Cologne Merheim Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, D-51109 Cologne, Germany
关键词
osteoarthritis; total knee replacement; computer-assisted surgery; navigation; leg alignment;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-007-0399-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Restoration of the mechanical leg axis and component positioning are crucial factors affecting long-term results in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In a prospective study, 1,000 patients were operated on either using a CT-free navigation system or the conventional jig-based technique. Leg alignment and component orientation were determined on postoperative X-rays. The mechanical leg axis was significantly better in the computer-assisted group (95%, within +/- 3 degrees varus/valgus) compared to the conventional group (74%, within +/- 3 degrees varus/valgus) (P < 0.001). On average, the operating time was increased by 8 min in the computer-assisted group. No significant differences were seen between senior and younger surgeons regarding postoperative leg alignment and operating time. Computer-assisted TKA leads to a more accurate restoration of leg alignment and component orientation compared to the conventional jig-based technique. Potential benefits in long-term outcome and functional improvement require further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 50
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty - Comparison with conventional methods [J].
Anderson, KC ;
Buehler, KC ;
Markel, DC .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (07) :132-138
[2]
Bäthis H, 2006, ORTHOPADE, V35, P1056, DOI 10.1007/s00132-006-1001-3
[3]
BARGREN JH, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P178
[4]
Intraoperative cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty [J].
Bäthis, H ;
Perlick, L ;
Tingart, M ;
Perlick, C ;
Lüring, C ;
Grifka, J .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2005, 125 (01) :16-20
[5]
Bäthis H, 2004, ORTHOPEDICS, V27, P476
[6]
Computer navigation versus standard instrumentation for TKA - A single-surgeon experience [J].
Bolognesi, M ;
Hofmann, A .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2005, (440) :162-169
[7]
Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique -: A randomised, prospective trial [J].
Chauhan, SK ;
Scott, RG ;
Breidahl, W ;
Beaver, RJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (03) :372-377
[8]
Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique [J].
Chin, PL ;
Yang, KY ;
Yeo, SJ ;
Lo, NN .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (05) :618-626
[9]
Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty - A prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation [J].
Decking, R ;
Markmann, Y ;
Fuchs, J ;
Puhl, W ;
Scharf, HP .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (03) :282-288
[10]
Delp SL, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P49