On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography

被引:62
作者
Borasi, G [1 ]
Nitrosi, A [1 ]
Ferrari, P [1 ]
Tassoni, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Azienda Osped Santa Maria Nuova, Serv Fis Sanitaria, I-42100 Reggio Emilia, RE, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.1569273
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
During a tender we evaluated the image performance of three commercially available active matrix flat panel imagers (AMFPI) for general radiography, one based on direct detection method (Se photoconductor) the other two on indirect detection method (CsI phosphor). Basic image quality parameters (MTF, NNPS, DQE) were evaluated with particular attention to dose and energy dependence. As it is known, presampling modulation transfer function (MTF) of selenium based detector is very high (at 70 W, 2 cycles/mm, 2.5 muGy, about 0.80). Indirect detection panels exhibit a comparable (lower) resolution (at 70 kV, 2 cycles/mm, 2.5 muGy, MTF is about 0.34 for both the systems analyzed) and a more pronounced energy and dose dependence could also be noted in one of them. As a consequence of the very high resolution, the normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS) of the direct system is substantially flat, very similar to a white noise. Considering that the sensitive layer of all detectors is the same (0.5 mm), the relatively higher NNPS values are related to selenium absorption properties (lower Z respect to CsI:Tl) and detector inherent noise. NNPSs of the other systems, at low frequencies, are comparable but the frequency dependence is significantly different. At 70 kV, 2.5 muGy, 0.5 cycles/mm detective quantum efficiency (DQE) is about 0.35 for the direct detection system, and about the same (0.6) for the indirect ones. The combined effect of additive and multiplicative noise components makes DQE dependence on dose not monotonic. DQE present a maximum for an intermediate exposure. This complex behavior may be useful to characterize the systems in terms of the monodimensional integral over the frequency of DQE (IDQE). Both visual contrast-detail experiment and the direct evaluation of the signal-to-noise ratio confirmed, at least in a qualitative way, the system performances predicted by IDQE. (C) 2003 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1719 / 1731
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Strategies to improve the signal and noise performance of active matrix, flat-panel imagers for diagnostic x-ray applications [J].
Antonuk, LE ;
Jee, KW ;
El-Mohri, Y ;
Maolinbay, M ;
Nassif, S ;
Rong, X ;
Zhao, Q ;
Siewerdsen, JH ;
Street, RA ;
Shah, KS .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (02) :289-306
[2]  
ARMILLE PA, 1979, AAPM MONOGRAPH, V3, P105
[3]   Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography [J].
Aufrichtig, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (07) :1349-1358
[4]   Accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV [J].
Boone, JM ;
Seibert, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (11) :1661-1670
[5]   Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel X-ray detector Contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy [J].
Chotas, HG ;
Ravin, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (03) :679-682
[6]  
COWEN AR, 1992, LEEDS XRAY TEST OBJE
[7]  
Cunningham I. A., 2000, HDB MED IMAGING, V1, P79
[8]   A comparison of the imaging properties of CCD-based devices used for small field digital mammography [J].
Evans, DS ;
Workman, A ;
Payne, M .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (01) :117-135
[9]   Effects of x-ray spectra on the DQE of a computed radiography system [J].
Fetterly, KA ;
Hangiandreou, NJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (02) :241-249
[10]   Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography [J].
Floyd, CE ;
Warp, RJ ;
Dobbins, JT ;
Chotas, HG ;
Baydush, AH ;
Vargas-Voracek, R ;
Ravin, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (03) :683-688