Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty

被引:79
作者
Catani, Fabio [1 ,2 ]
Biasca, Nicola [3 ]
Ensini, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Leardini, Alberto [1 ]
Bianchi, Luca [2 ]
Digennaro, Vitantonio [2 ]
Giannini, Sandro [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Movement Anal Lab, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
[2] Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Dept Orthopaed Surg, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
[3] Spital Oberengandin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, CH-7503 Samedan, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.G.00293
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty is aimed at improving accuracy in the positioning of prosthetic components and realigning the lower limb. The optimal position and orientation of the bone resection planes are targeted by the navigation system, but, after these are obtained, additional manual surgical actions, which may considerably affect final component alignment, are necessary for implantation. The aim of this study was to measure the alignment deviation caused by standard impaction of the tibial and femoral components following bone resections with use of navigation control. Methods: Ninety-one primary total knee arthroplasties were performed with an image-free knee navigation system. The alignment of the tibial and femoral bone resections was measured in three planes during surgery by the instrumented probe of the system. The alignment measure was repeated after final tibial and femoral component implantation with cement. The alignment deviations between the two measures were considered the positioning error associated with the final manual implantation of the components. Results: The alignment deviations between the bone resections and the subsequent implant placement were > 1 degrees in the frontal plane of the femur and in the frontal and sagittal planes of the tibia in 20%, 11%, and 33% of the patients, respectively. The deviations were > 2 degrees in 4%, 3%, and 9% of the patients, respectively. Deviations as large as 30 were found at the tibia in the sagittal plane (the posterior slope). Conclusions: Positioning of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty, which mainly involves cementation and impaction of the final components, can introduce a considerable error in alignment, regardless of how accurately the resection planes are made. After computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty, it would be useful therefore to check the alignment of the prosthetic component carefully before the cement hardens.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 771
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty - Comparison with conventional methods [J].
Anderson, KC ;
Buehler, KC ;
Markel, DC .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (07) :132-138
[2]
Alignment in total knee arthroplasty -: A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique [J].
Bäthis, H ;
Perlick, L ;
Tingart, M ;
Lüring, C ;
Zurakowski, D ;
Grifka, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (05) :682-687
[3]
Intraoperative cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty [J].
Bäthis, H ;
Perlick, L ;
Tingart, M ;
Perlick, C ;
Lüring, C ;
Grifka, J .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2005, 125 (01) :16-20
[4]
Computer navigation versus standard instrumentation for TKA - A single-surgeon experience [J].
Bolognesi, M ;
Hofmann, A .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2005, (440) :162-169
[5]
Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique -: A randomised, prospective trial [J].
Chauhan, SK ;
Scott, RG ;
Breidahl, W ;
Beaver, RJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (03) :372-377
[6]
Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique [J].
Chin, PL ;
Yang, KY ;
Yeo, SJ ;
Lo, NN .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (05) :618-626
[7]
Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty - A prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation [J].
Decking, R ;
Markmann, Y ;
Fuchs, J ;
Puhl, W ;
Scharf, HP .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (03) :282-288
[8]
Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty [J].
Ensini, A. ;
Catani, F. ;
Leardini, A. ;
Romagnoli, M. ;
Giannini, S. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (457) :156-162
[9]
EWALD FC, 1989, KNEE SOC TOTAL KNEE, V248, P9
[10]
Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty [J].
Haaker, RG ;
Stockheim, M ;
Kamp, M ;
Proff, G ;
Breitenfelder, J ;
Ottersbach, A .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2005, (433) :152-159