Reproducibility and error sources of μ-MRI-based trabecular bone structural parameters of the distal radius and tibia

被引:72
作者
Gomberg, BR [1 ]
Wehrli, FW [1 ]
Vasilic, B [1 ]
Weening, RH [1 ]
Saha, PK [1 ]
Song, HK [1 ]
Wright, AC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Lab Struct NMR Imaging, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
mu-MRI; distal radius; trabecular bone;
D O I
10.1016/j.bone.2004.02.017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The mechanical competence of trabecular bone is significantly determined, next to material density, by its three-dimensional (3D) structure. Recent advances in micromagnetic resonance imaging (mu-MRI) acquisition and processing techniques allow the 3D trabecular structure to be analyzed in vivo at peripheral sites such as the distal radius and tibia. The practicality of mu-MRI-based noninvasive virtual bone biopsy (VBB) for longitudinal studies of patients hinges on the reproducibility of the derived structural parameters, which largely determine the size of the effect that can be detected at a given power and significance level. In this paper, the reproducibility of mu-MRI-derived trabecular bone structure measures was examined by performing repeat studies in six healthy subjects in whom the distal aspects of the radius and tibia were scanned with a 3D spin-echo sequence at 137 x 137 x 410 mum(3) voxel size. Bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and digital topological analysis (DTA) structural parameters including the topological bone surface-to-curve ratio (SCR) and topological erosion index (TEI) were evaluated after subjecting the raw images to a cascade of processing steps. The average coefficient of variation was 4-7% and was comparable for the two anatomic sites and for all parameters measured. The reliability expressed in terms of the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.95 to 0.97 in the radius and 0.68 to 0.92 in the tibia. Error analysis based on simulations suggests involuntary patient motion, primarily rotation, to be the chief source of imprecision, followed by failure to accurately match the analysis volumes in repeat studies. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 276
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]  
Hipp JA, 1996, J BONE MINER RES, V11, P286
[12]   Probability-based structural parameters from three-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance images as predictors of trabecular bone strength [J].
Hwang, SN ;
Wehrli, FW ;
Williams, JL .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (08) :1255-1261
[13]   Subvoxel processing: A method for reducing partial volume blurring with application to in vivo MR images of trablecular bone [J].
Hwang, SN ;
Wehrli, FW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2002, 47 (05) :948-957
[14]   HIGH-RESOLUTION VARIABLE FLIP ANGLE 3D MR IMAGING OF TRABECULAR MICROSTRUCTURE INVIVO [J].
JARA, H ;
WEHRLI, FW ;
CHUNG, H ;
FORD, JC .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1993, 29 (04) :528-539
[15]   THE ROLE OF 3-DIMENSIONAL TRABECULAR MICROSTRUCTURE IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES [J].
KLEEREKOPER, M ;
VILLANUEVA, AR ;
STANCIU, J ;
RAO, DS ;
PARFITT, AM .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1985, 37 (06) :594-597
[16]  
Laib A, 1998, Technol Health Care, V6, P329
[17]   Ridge number density:: A new parameter for in vivo bone structure analysis [J].
Laib, A ;
Hildebrand, T ;
Häuselmann, HJ ;
Rüegsegger, P .
BONE, 1997, 21 (06) :541-546
[18]   In vivo high resolution MRI of the calcaneus: Differences in trabecular structure in osteoporosis patients [J].
Link, TM ;
Majumdar, S ;
Augat, P ;
Lin, JC ;
Newitt, D ;
Lu, Y ;
Lane, NE ;
Genant, HK .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1998, 13 (07) :1175-1182
[19]   Bone structure of the distal radius and the calcaneus vs BMD of the spine and proximal femur in the prediction of osteoporotic spine fractures [J].
Link, TM ;
Vieth, V ;
Matheis, J ;
Newitt, D ;
Lu, Y ;
Rummeny, EJ ;
Majumdar, S .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (02) :401-408
[20]   Fast 3D large-angle spin-echo imaging (3D FLASE) [J].
Ma, JF ;
Wehrli, FW ;
Song, HK .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 35 (06) :903-910