Cancer risk elicitation and communication: Lessons from the psychology of risk perception

被引:132
作者
Klein, William M. P. [1 ]
Stefanek, Michael E.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Amer Canc Soc, Behav Res Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3322/canjclin.57.3.147
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cancer risk perceptions area key predictor of risk-reduction practices, health behaviors, and processing of cancer information. Nevertheless, patients and the general public (as well as health care providers) exhibit a number of errors and biases in the way they think about risk, such that their risk perceptions and decisions deviate greatly from those prescribed by normative decision models and by experts in risk assessment. For example, people are more likely to engage in screening behaviors such as mammography when faced with loss-based messages than gain-framed messages, and they often ignore the base rate of a given disease when assessing their own risk of obtaining this disease. In this article, we review many of the psychological processes that underlie risk perception and discuss how these processes lead to such deviations. Among these processes are difficulties with use of numerical information (innumeracy), cognitive processes (eg, use of time-saving heuristics), motivational factors (eg, loss and regret aversion), and emotion. We conclude with suggestions for future research in the area, as well as implications for improving the elicitation and communication of personal cancer risk.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 167
页数:21
相关论文
共 148 条
[1]   PERSEVERANCE OF SOCIAL THEORIES - THE ROLE OF EXPLANATION IN THE PERSISTENCE OF DISCREDITED INFORMATION [J].
ANDERSON, CA ;
LEPPER, MR ;
ROSS, L .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 39 (06) :1037-1049
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, RISK DECISION POLICY, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1357530902000601
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, GUID READ LAB PACK L
[4]   Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies [J].
Antoniou, A ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Narod, S ;
Risch, HA ;
Eyfjord, JE ;
Hopper, JL ;
Loman, N ;
Olsson, H ;
Johannsson, O ;
Borg, Å ;
Pasini, B ;
Radice, P ;
Manoukian, S ;
Eccles, DM ;
Tang, N ;
Olah, E ;
Anton-Culver, H ;
Warner, E ;
Lubinski, J ;
Gronwald, J ;
Gorski, B ;
Tulinius, H ;
Thorlacius, S ;
Eerola, H ;
Nevanlinna, H ;
Syrjäkoski, K ;
Kallioniemi, OP ;
Thompson, D ;
Evans, C ;
Peto, J ;
Lalloo, F ;
Evans, DG ;
Easton, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) :1117-1130
[5]   THE BASE-RATE FALLACY - CONTRASTING PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES OF GROUP AND INDIVIDUAL JUDGMENT [J].
ARGOTE, L ;
DEVADAS, R ;
MELONE, N .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1990, 46 (02) :296-310
[6]   THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SUNK COST [J].
ARKES, HR ;
BLUMER, C .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1985, 35 (01) :124-140
[7]   THE EFFECTS OF MESSAGE FRAMING ON MAMMOGRAPHY UTILIZATION [J].
BANKS, SM ;
SALOVEY, P ;
GREENER, S ;
ROTHMAN, AJ ;
MOYER, A ;
BEAUVAIS, J ;
EPEL, E .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 14 (02) :178-184
[8]   On the pursuit and misuse of useless information [J].
Bastardi, A ;
Shafir, E .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 75 (01) :19-32
[9]   Patients' understanding of risk associated with medication use - Impact of European Commission guidelines and other risk scales [J].
Berry, DC ;
Raynor, DK ;
Knapp, P ;
Bersellini, E .
DRUG SAFETY, 2003, 26 (01) :1-11
[10]   RISK PERCEPTIONS AND PARTICIPATION IN COLORECTAL-CANCER SCREENING [J].
BLALOCK, SJ ;
DEVELLIS, BM ;
AFIFI, RA ;
SANDLER, RS .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 9 (06) :792-806