Multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms: Comparison of arterial enhancement with 3 different doses of contrast material

被引:8
作者
Kubo, Shigeto
Tadamura, Eiji
Yamamuro, Masaki
Kanao, Shotaro
Kataoka, Milliam Lika
Takahashi, Masaya
Kimura, Takeshi
Kita, Toru
Komeda, Masashi
Togashi, Kaori
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Med Nucl & Diagnost Imaging, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Kyoto, Japan
[4] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Kyoto, Japan
关键词
aortic aneurysm; contrast media; multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography; saline flush;
D O I
10.1097/01.rct.0000237819.64419.d2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the quality of multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography in patients with and without aortic aneurysms by 3 different amounts of contrast media (CM). Methods: A total of 115 patients with aortic aneurysms were divided into 3 groups: group A, 100 mL CM; group 13, 75 mL CM with 20 mL saline flush (SF); and group C, 50 mL CM with 20 mL SF. Twenty-five patients without aortic aneurysms were also enrolled (group D, 50 mL CM with 20 mL SF). Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed by measuring attenuation in thoracoabdominal/ aortoiliac lumen, aneurysmal lumen, and superior vena cava. Results: In group C, attenuation was lower in distal than those in proximal and middle areas (P < 0.05). Contrast enhancement in abdominal aneurysmal lumen was more inhomogeneous in group C (P = 0.003). Visual analysis showed contrast enhancement was more nonuniform in group C (P = 0.004), and perivenous artifacts were more conspicuous in group A (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Seventy-five milliliters CM followed by 20 mL SF can produce optimal contrast enhancement at systemic multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography in patients with aortic aneurysms.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 429
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT [J].
Awai, K ;
Inoue, M ;
Yagyu, Y ;
Watanabe, M ;
Sano, T ;
Nin, S ;
Koike, R ;
Nishimura, Y ;
Yamashita, Y .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (03) :682-688
[2]   Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight [J].
Awai, K ;
Hiraishi, K ;
Hori, S .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (01) :142-150
[3]   Uniform vascular contrast enhancement and reduced contrast medium volume achieved by using exponentially decelerated contrast material injection method [J].
Bae, KT ;
Tran, HQ ;
Heiken, JP .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (03) :732-736
[4]   Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model [J].
Bae, KT ;
Heiken, JP ;
Brink, JA .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) :657-662
[5]  
BANDYK DF, 1989, SURG CLIN N AM, V69, P721
[6]   Intravenous contrast material administration at helical 16-detector row CT coronary angiography: Effect of iodine concentration on vascular attenuation [J].
Cademartiri, F ;
Mollet, NR ;
van der Lugt, A ;
McFadden, EP ;
Stijnen, T ;
de Feyter, PJ ;
Krestin, GP .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 236 (02) :661-665
[7]   ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM - CT EVALUATION OF RENAL-ARTERY INVOLVEMENT [J].
COHAN, RH ;
SIEGEL, CL ;
KOROBKIN, M ;
STANLEY, JC ;
ALPERN, MB ;
COURNEYA, DL ;
LEDER, RA .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (03) :751-756
[8]   Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography [J].
Fleischmann, D ;
Rubin, GD ;
Bankier, AA ;
Hittmair, K .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (02) :363-371
[9]  
GOLDSTONE J, 1993, VASCULAR SURG COMPRE, P401
[10]   Reduction of contrast material dose and artifacts by a saline flush using a double power injector in helical CT of the thorax [J].
Haage, P ;
Schmitz-Rode, T ;
Hübner, D ;
Piroth, W ;
Günther, RW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (04) :1049-1053