LATTICE STRAIN FROM SUBSTITUTIONAL GA AND FROM HOLES IN HEAVILY DOPED SI-GA

被引:21
作者
KAVANAGH, KL [1 ]
CARGILL, GS [1 ]
机构
[1] IBM CORP,THOMAS J WATSON RES CTR,DIV RES,YORKTOWN HTS,NY 10598
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW B | 1992年 / 45卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevB.45.3323
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The average lattice strain per Ga atom with respect to pure silicon, beta(total) = DELTA-a/aN(Ga) = +(0.9 +/- 0.1) x 10(-24) cm3, for heavily doped Si:Ga was measured by high-resolution x-ray diffraction. This strain includes effects of both substitutional Ga atoms in the lattice and doping-related holes in the valence band. The local "size-effect" lattice strain around substitutional Ga atoms, which is not expected to be affected significantly by valence-band holes, was determined from the Ga-to-Si nearest-neighbor distance measured using extended x-ray-absorption fine structure (EXAFS). This distance, r(NN) = 2.41 +/- 0.02 angstrom, is 0.06 angstrom larger than the usual Si-to-Si nearest-neighbor distance and was used to calculate the size-effect contribution per Ga atom to the average lattice strain, beta(size) = (1.2 +/- 0.3) x 10(-24) cm3. This value was subtracted from the overall lattice strain beta(total) to determine the lattice strain per valence-band hole, beta(h) = -(0.3 +/- 0.3) x 10(-24) cm3, and the hydrostatic deformation potential for the valence-band edge in silicon, a(upsilon) = -0.5 +/- 0.5 eV. These results were obtained from Si:Ga samples prepared by liquid-phase epitaxy. They were characterized by Rutherford backscattering, ion channeling, electron microscopy, and resistivity measurements, as well as by x-ray diffraction and EXAFS. The samples were of excellent crystal quality, with uniform Ga concentrations of 1.0 and 1.5 x 10(20) cm-3, with substitutional fractions greater than 95% and similar electrical resistivities of 2 x 10(-3) OMEGA cm.
引用
收藏
页码:3323 / 3331
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
APPLE WH, 1985, THESIS U STUTTGART
[2]   ELECTRICAL AND BACKSCATTERING STUDIES OF THERMALLY ANNEALED GALLIUM IMPLANTED SILICON [J].
ARORA, BM ;
CASTILLO, JM ;
KURUP, MB ;
SHARMA, RP .
RADIATION EFFECTS AND DEFECTS IN SOLIDS, 1982, 63 (1-4) :47-54
[3]   INFLUENCE OF UNIAXIAL STRESS ON INDIRECT ABSORPTION EDGE IN SILICON AND GERMANIUM [J].
BALSLEV, I .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1966, 143 (02) :636-&
[4]   DEFORMATION POTENTIALS AND MOBILITIES IN NON-POLAR CRYSTALS [J].
BARDEEN, J ;
SHOCKLEY, W .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1950, 80 (01) :72-80
[5]   LATTICE-DISTORTIONS INDUCED BY B, P, AS AND SB IN SILICON [J].
BECKER, P ;
SCHEFFLER, M .
ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION A, 1984, 40 :C341-C341
[6]   SENSITIVITY OF X-RAY-DIFFRACTOMETRY FOR STRAIN DEPTH PROFILING IN III-V HETEROSTRUCTURES [J].
BENSOUSSAN, S ;
MALGRANGE, C ;
SAUVAGESIMKIN, M .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, 1987, 20 :222-229
[7]   PHOTOSTRICTION EFFECT IN SILICON OBSERVED BY TIME-RESOLVED X-RAY-DIFFRACTION [J].
BUSCHERT, JR ;
COLELLA, R .
SOLID STATE COMMUNICATIONS, 1991, 80 (06) :419-422
[8]  
BUSCHERT JR, 1989, THESIS PURDUE U
[9]   LATTICE COMPRESSION FROM CONDUCTION ELECTRONS IN HEAVILY DOPED SI-AS [J].
CARGILL, GS ;
ANGILELLO, J ;
KAVANAGH, KL .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1988, 61 (15) :1748-1751
[10]   STUDY OF DISORDERED SYSTEMS BY EXAFS - LIMITATIONS [J].
EISENBERGER, P ;
BROWN, GS .
SOLID STATE COMMUNICATIONS, 1979, 29 (06) :481-484