Clinical evaluation of digital radiography based on a large-area cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector compared with screen-film radiography for skeletal system and abdomen

被引:26
作者
Okamura, T
Tanaka, S
Koyama, K
Norihumi, N
Daikokuya, H
Matsuoka, T
Kishimoto, K
Hatagawa, M
Kudoh, H
Yamada, R
机构
[1] Osaka City Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Abeno Ku, Osaka 5458585, Japan
[2] Osaka City Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Abeno Ku, Osaka 5458585, Japan
关键词
flat-panel detector; screen-film system; amorphous silicon; digital radiography; conventional radiography;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-001-1283-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
The aim of this clinical study was to compare the image quality of digital radiography using the new digital Bucky system based on a flat-panel detector with that of a conventional screen-film system for the skeletal structure and the abdomen. Fifty patients were examined using digital radiography with a flat-panel detector and screen-film systems, 25 for the skeletal structures and 25 for the abdomen. Six radiologists judged each paired image acquired under the same exposure parameters concerning three observation items for the bone and six items for the abdomen. Digital radiographic images for the bone were evaluated to be similar to screen-film images at the mean of 42.2%, to be superior at 50.2%, and to be inferior at 7.6%. Digital radiographic images for the abdomen were judged to be similar to screen-film images at the mean of 43.4%, superior at 52.4%, and inferior at 4.2%; thus, digital radiographic images were estimated to be either similar as or superior to screen-film images at over 92% for the bone and abdomen. On the statistical analysis, digital radiographic images were also judged to be preferred significantly in the most items for the bone and abdomen. In conclusion, the image quality of digital radiography with a flat-panel detector was superior to that of a screen-film system under the same exposure parameters, suggesting that dose reduction is possible with digital radiography.
引用
收藏
页码:1741 / 1747
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
Initial technical and clinical evaluation of a new universal image receptor system [J].
Bury, RF ;
Cowen, AR ;
Davies, AG ;
Hawkridge, P ;
Bruijns, AJC ;
von Reth, E .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (12) :1983-1987
[2]
New CsI/a-Si 17" x 17" X-ray flat panel detector provides superior detectivity and immediate direct digital output for General Radiography systems [J].
Chaussat, C ;
Chabbal, J ;
Ducourant, T ;
Spinnler, V ;
Vieux, G ;
Neyret, R .
PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 3336 :45-56
[3]
Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel X-ray detector Contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy [J].
Chotas, HG ;
Ravin, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (03) :679-682
[4]
THRESHOLD PERCEPTION PERFORMANCE WITH COMPUTED AND SCREEN-FILM RADIOGRAPHY - IMPLICATIONS FOR CHEST RADIOGRAPHY [J].
DOBBINS, JT ;
RICE, JJ ;
BEAM, CA ;
RAVIN, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 183 (01) :179-187
[5]
SELENIUM-BASED DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY OF THE CHEST - RADIOLOGISTS PREFERENCE COMPARED WITH FILM-SCREEN RADIOGRAPHS [J].
FLOYD, CE ;
BAKER, JA ;
CHOTAS, HG ;
DELONG, DM ;
RAVIN, CE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 165 (06) :1353-1358
[6]
Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography [J].
Floyd, CE ;
Warp, RJ ;
Dobbins, JT ;
Chotas, HG ;
Baydush, AH ;
Vargas-Voracek, R ;
Ravin, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (03) :683-688
[7]
Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging:: Diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study [J].
Garmer, M ;
Hennigs, SP ;
Jäger, HJ ;
Schrick, F ;
van de Loo, T ;
Jacobs, A ;
Hanusch, A ;
Christmann, A ;
Mathias, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (01) :75-80
[8]
Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: Comparison of soft-copy images [J].
Goo, JM ;
Im, JG ;
Kim, JH ;
Seo, JB ;
Kim, TS ;
Shine, SJ ;
Lee, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 175 (04) :1013-1018
[9]
Comparison of low-contrast detail detectability with five different conventional and digital radiographic imaging systems [J].
Neitzel, U ;
Böhm, A ;
Maack, I .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: IMAGE PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2000, 3981 :216-223
[10]
Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system [J].
Spahn, M ;
Strotzer, M ;
Völk, M ;
Böhm, S ;
Geiger, B ;
Hahm, G ;
Feuerbach, S .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (04) :260-266